搜

... Level Up! Online Strategies for Managing Student Workers Lynn Colbert, Acquisitions Librarian, lcolbert@marian.edu - Mother Theresa Hackelmeier Memorial Library, Marian University - Indianapolis Level 0 Level 1 Learning Management System (LMS) Photo courtesy of Megan West PALNI Digital Communications Manager In 2012, I took over managing student workers. The first issue I noticed was a lack of centralized communication. To solve the issue, I created a class in the universitys learning management system, Canvas. Level 2 Google Calendar In 2013, I began maintaining student work schedules in Google Calendar. I embedded the calendar in Canvas so students could view their schedules as well. Background Google Drive Marian University is a small liberal arts university in Indianapolis, IN. The library Staff is small but mighty and thrives on the power of our student workers. To successfully manage student work, I created an online space in our learning management system, incorporated project management applications, Google apps, and free web-based tools to assist with supervision. I migrated all student worker documents to Google Drive to have a centralized location for files. I linked to key items within Canvas to increase student accessibility. Photo courtesy of Lynn Colbert With the help of our Director of Academic Technology, we enhanced the class by creating an online space for the student handbook, orientation and training modules, and communication. Thus Student Assistant Library Orientation (SALOR) was created. Students are informed of policy changes, hour adjustments, and meetings through announcements in Canvas. I assess effectiveness of training modules through post-tests. Project Management Applications I had students experiment with two project management platforms - Trello and Slack - to determine which better satistified our needs. After several tests, Trello advanced as the winner. It is too soon to determine the success of group texting although early experimentation is encouraging. Conclusion Google Forms Pros Pros Pros Centralized communication Online training platform Online student handbook Centralized location for all documents Students can access material from anywhere Time off requests are compiled on a Google Sheet for ease of viewing Easy to use Well received by students Any staff member can assign tasks to a student Smartphone app available and easy to utilize for both librarians and students Passive communication FTE: 3400+ Full-time librarians: 3 Part-time librarians: 2 Student managers: 4 Student workers: 11 (no interaction) IT spam filters strong, some notifications go to junk mail Students not referring to it as regularly as hoped Group Texting Apps In 2015, I looked for a more efficient way to assign tasks to students. Previously, I left written notes in a file slot or wrote notes on a dry erase board. Neither method was well received. Previously, all time off requests were done via email and would get lost in an inbox. I created a Google Form to keep track of requests as well as verify that shifts are covered. Cons Bonus level In 2017, I incorporated a group texting app, GroupMe, into my online strategy. Students already utilize the app for essential communication in the dorms. Several students asked if we could use it in the library. Students agree this platform is the best online management tool I have incorporated thus far. Tasks are clearly assigned and announcements are easy to find. Librarians can clearly see what a student worker should be doing. Photo courtesy of Lynn Colbert Library Demographics Level 3 Cons Cons University uses Students do not utilize Microsoft Suite instead of Google Passive communication it when not at work Cannot push notifications for coverage requests All product and company names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Use of them does not imply any affiliation with or endorsement by them. Overall, each online resource fulfills a unique need in managing student workers. We utilize our LMS for training and orientation, Google apps for document management, Trello for project management, and GroupMe for communication. The combination of all these resources has made for a successful online management of our student workers. Resources Canvas canvas.instructure.com. Google Calendar google.com/calendar Google Drive google.com/drive Google Forms google.com/forms GroupMe groupme.com Trello trello.com  ...

... The item referenced in this repository content can be found by following the link on the descriptive page.  ...

... Students are the typical or expected attendees for librarygenerated workshops, programming, and instruction. They don't know what they don't know...and we're here to help! H e e , b ilding ela i n hi im e c llec i n , in lib a a egicall in i i nal g al . i h fac l c i n, and align he de a men and he What Who How When Why/Outcomes Food and fun in February--sounded like a winning combination. Coordinated resources with themes and cross-disciplinary use/interest. Questions-Opportunities-Pitfalls? http://bit.l /2fPEG1B ll a en ees in ica e ha he ha no e perience i h he apps ake i more in erac i e pen o s aff en announcemen s earlier DA TIME B OD Surveying the needs of faculty takes time and effort, beyond their immediate requests for resources or scheduling a one-shot instruction session. "Whe fac f e IL c a ca de ' de c ab a e h b a a e e c e , he e a g f ca e e a ed e ea ch ." Timing Time Need Interactive and Collaborative Dupuis, E. (2009, Aug). Amplifying the Educational Role of Librarians. Research Library Issues : A bi-monthly report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, 265, 9-14. Retrieved from: http://old.arl.org/bm~doc/rli-265-dupuis.pdf Junisbai, B., Lowe, S.M., & Tagge, N. (2016, Sept). A Pragmatic and Flexible Approach to Information Literacy: Findings from a Three-Year Study of Faculty-Librarian Collaboration. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 604-611. Shen, L. (2012). Improving the Effectiveness of LibrarianFaculty Collaboration. Collaborative Librarianship, 4(1), 14-22  ...

... Add It Up: Using Data to Make Informed Spatial Decisions Lynn Colbert, Access Services Librarian Mother Theresa Hackelmeier Memorial Library, Marian University INTRODUCTION PROCESS In 2016, Marian Universitys library began collecting data on how patrons utilized our building. We conducted student surveys, held focus groups, and collected spatial data using Suma, an open-source assessment toolkit. RESULTS Results from our Suma assessment indicated study tables and collaboration spaces were a priority because of their high usage. We updated tables and chairs in these areas. After the improvements, we saw a nearly 7% increase in usage of those areas. The collaboration space on the second floor, already a popular area, saw an 8.75% increase in usage. In 2019, in response to the student surveys, the library began upgrades to our building including new furniture and additional technology. We utilized results from Suma studies to make evidencebased decisions about where to focus our improvements. Through our computer usage assessment, we determined we could reduce the number of machines and repurpose some of that space on the first floor. We were able to install a virtual reality unit in that area, expanding the type of technology available in the library. ABOUT SUMA Suma is an open-source mobile web-based assessment toolkit for collecting and analyzing observational data about the usage of physical spaces. Suma was created by NC State to assist in collecting data in areas traditionally difficult to access such as use of physical space. Suma provides data analysis and visualization capabilities to aid in space design and day-to-day planning. OVERVIEW For one week in the spring, student workers used Suma to conduct an hour-by-hour assessment of how individuals used the library during a representative week. We repeated the process in Fall 2019 after upgrades were made to determine if there were changes in usage. DATA COLLECTED Areas most utilized Student carrel usage Overall computer usage Computer usage by area DATA USAGE The information we gathered from these assessments have been used to make informed decisions about the following: Hours Furniture improvements and placement Technology arrangements Location of noise cancelling devices FALL 2019* SPRING 2019 Suma provides the ability to tailor your experience to your institutions needs. For our library, we broke down data points into the following categories: Designated floor Area within the floor Activity in that area (e.g. independent study, working in a group, browsing the stacks) CONSIDERATIONS When picking a typical week, pick one away from midterms, finals, and holidays. Changing physical locations of items means comparisons may not be consistent from year to year. Clearly define areas to assess, choose logical names, and create a map to help those collecting data know boundaries. Data results in Suma do not easily connect activity with space use. Further data manipulation may be required. RESOURCES NC State - lib.ncsu.edu/projects/suma PALNI - libguides.palni.edu/analytics/suma Furniture upgrades and spatial changes took place over summer/fall of 2019. Data reflects early impact of change implementation. Further data collection will be necessary to see full impact. CONCLUSION Initial Suma assessment shows the improvements we made lead to increased usage of the building. Fall data results are encouraging, but to get a better assessment of the impact, we will track usage again in the spring to make a more accurate comparison.  ...

... How Librarians Brought an NLM Exhibit to Their Institutions Carolyn Martin, MLS AHIP, Caryl Wyatt, MLS and Chris Bishop, MLS Objectives Three libraries in Indianapolis provide a unique example of collaboration by hosting a National Library of Medicine traveling exhibit at three locations within the city. Hosting the exhibit, Harry Potters World, will provide greater awareness of the libraries and their host institutions through a fun educational atmosphere and bring attention to National Library of Medicine resources through Harry Potter stories. Methods The National Library of Medicine traveling exhibits are an overlooked resource that can benefit clinicians, researchers, students, educators and the general public. The poster showcases a unique collaboration between a consortium of libraries in central Indiana as a way to encourage all kinds of libraries to consider hosting an exhibit to engage their communities in health and medicine. A community college librarian requested funding from the Central Indiana Health Sciences Library Consortium (CIHSLC) for the National Library of Medicine traveling exhibit, Harry Potters World: Renaissance Science, Magic, and Medicine to come to her library and other libraries of CIHSLC. The community college librarian contacted NLM and reported back that NLM was agreeable to this unique request where three various organizations in one city collaborated to host an exhibit over three booking periods. Results Each of the three libraries hosted and promoted the exhibit through various marketing tools, such as events, flyers, and handouts. Students and faculty expressed their appreciation for the exhibit, and faculty members reached out to librarians on ways to incorporate the exhibit into assignments for health science students. Conclusions The collaboration of three libraries to bring a NLM travelling exhibit to Indianapolis was a success. Utilizing the resources of both the Consortium and the National Library of Medicine benefitted not only the libraries, but also the students and faculty who were impacted by experiencing the exhibit and made aware of the resources available to them through their library and the NLM.  ...

... Leveraging LMS Integration with LibGuides Edward Mandity, Chris Bishop Mother Theresa Hackelmeier Memorial Library, Marian University Indianapolis Introduction Workflow In Spring 2015 library staff decided to experiment with integrating library content within its LMS, Canvas by Instructure. As faculty migrate their content to the platform, having library content discoverable is a convenient way to encourage library experimentation and LMS buy-in. LibGuide content is best displayed within Canvas in two stages. Content is first prepared via its widgets tool function. The scope of content for import can vary greatly, but entire guides, guide pages, or even content boxes are configurable for display. The purpose was to better streamline access to library content, specifically our new discovery layer, directly to students in their online learning space. The initial obstacles concerned just how to embed active content directly within Canvas, with the solution being to use an intermediary widget functionality located within Sp ing ha e LibGuides platform. Workflow, cont. Once the LibGuide URL is generated, it is easily added via the Redirect Tool. Using the installed Redirect Tool is easy, but can be confusing. Simply click on the Add App button once installed . Configuration involves selecting the desired content for creation, specifically generating a URL Embed Type from the widget tool. After creation of this URL, stage two the process involves installing the Redirect Tool App from within Canvas. Once installed within a course, the app adds navigational items to a course via the URL generated within LibGuides. After the app is created, the final step is to simply refresh the page for the navigational item to be displayed. Canvas editors can then modify page settings to adjust where the item can be displayed on the navigational page. Name your navigational item. Make sure the navigational item category is selected for display. Click AddApp. Analytics: Google Analytics URLs Referring Embedded search box within Canvas Direct links from LibGuides no Canvas Permalinks in LibGuides within Canvas Searches from Embedded search in LibGuides (no canvas), top, and guide on the side tutorial. Canvas Stats ENG 101 D&F 36 total views among 16 total students from 2 sections. Above is a search box added to the common horizontal navigation for all Canvas users. A serendipitous discovery. Background To the left is the widget creation for a specific Guide and box within LibGuides Getting faculty to adopt widespread use of library items within Canvas involves the use of LibGuides. After experimenting with basic integrative functionality, consultations with a few key users of specific guides proved useful in demonstrating practicality and usefulness to the campus as a whole. Faculty buy-in comes mainly from selected faculty in Health Sciences (Nursing) and Liberal Arts Departments (English). Library staff would undertake responsibility for adding content within LibGuides and Canvas. All that was required of the faculty member was to add library staff as course contributor to the Canvas workspace. As far as extent of content added, much of the addition to the LMS involved adding entire guides rather than focused content boxes within certain guides. Below is the embed code and preview display for insertion into Canvas. UBC Internship 2 total views, among 2 students within the summer course. Once added, refresh the page and your navigational item will be displayed. Click settings to reorder navigational items. Nursing 400 Research from 2 sections. 177 views, among 22 students Caveats to Consider Not everything that can be displayed in LibGuides can necessarily be displayed in Canvas. LibGuides does not process Javascript-based content. Content boxes with overly complicated scripts will display a blank page within the LMS. Proxied content. Content from items like Films on Demand will display certificate errors when attempting to access from within Canvas from an off-campus location. RSS feeds (proxied or unproxied) fail to display within Canvas. No Google Analytics for the top, horizontal search box (coming soon!) Conclusions Content can be linked directly from LibGuides within Canvas. Not only that, but data can be collected, though drilling down to the specific sources can be difficult using Google Analytics. More experimentation will be required, especially with a larger sample of faculty allowing us to use their online course spaces. But with the new addition of the LTI Tool, course integration of library resources looks very promising.  ...

... Investigating the Effects of Penicillin and Essential Oils on the Viability of Staphylococcus aureus Jacqueline Benitez, Abigail Rost ABSTRACT The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus related illnesses is posing an alarmingly dangerous lifestyle for individuals with compromised immune systems. The increasing resistance of bacterial strains and microorganisms to conventional antibiotics and treatments is a serious problem that has alerted scientists to identify new approaches to prevent their emergence. Essential oils contain properties that are capable of inhibiting or slowing the growth of bacteria. The combination of antibiotics and essential oils are representing a new development in combating antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of essential oils and penicillin in decreasing the viability of S. aureus. The disk diffusion assay was utilized to examine the effects of penicillin and the essential oils, lavender and tea tree oil, individually and in combination. All the treatments decreased S. aureus viability to different extents, by exhibiting moderate zones of inhibition. Penicillin was observed to be more potent than the essential oils. In addition, the efficacy of the combination of penicillin and the essential oils was investigated. Interestingly, the results portrayed the combinations had a lower potency than the sum of the individual treatments. The results demonstrated that the essential oils of lavender and tea tree can be used as potential antibacterial agents against S. aureus infections and penicillin in combination with essential oils has an antagonist effect. INTRODUCTION Antibiotics are the most common form of treatment in fighting infectious disease and have tremendously enhanced the health of individuals since their creation. However, the incidents of antibiotic resistant infections are alarmingly on the rise. The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance have occurred due to many factors. The main factor influencing the emergence is the excessive bacterial exposure to antibiotics with the intensive use in the community. Bacterial strains are becoming resistant to multiple antibiotics that is fueling the rampant spread. The persistence of antibiotic resistance urges the need of finding new therapies against the multiantibiotic resistant bacteria. The model organism under investigation is Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus is among the bacterial species of high interest in research. S. aureus is a commensal bacterium and human pathogen that causes clinical infections and bacteremia (Tong et al, 2015). Bacteremia can lead to sepsis, death and both incidence and mortality from S. aureus- associated bacteremia are on the rise (Van Hal et al, 2012). Infectious strains of S. aureus are commonly found in hospital settings; however, they are now major community-based pathogens (Knox et al, 2015). Approximately 30% of the human population is colonized with S. aureus due to its prevalence in household environments (Tong et al, 2015). S. aureus can be found on the skin and mucous membranes, allowing humans to be major reservoirs (Tong et al, 2019). These strains become pathogenic when introduced to a debilitated immune system (Tong et al, 2015). Due to their prevalence, S. aureus are becoming resistant to standard treatments, such as penicillin and treatments, such as topical antibacterial (Charles & Simon, 1990). The emergence of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is becoming a significant health concern, not only in clinical settings, but also in homes (Charles & Simon, 1990). Therefore, it is important to identify potential ways to enhance the efficacy of common antibiotics that can also be safely used in household environments against S. aureus. The standard treatment for infections relating to S. aureus is penicillin. Penicillin functions by bursting the bacterial cell wall by acting directly on peptidoglycans (Penicillin, 2019). However, there are strains of S. aureus that have evolved resistance to penicillin through a variety of mechanisms. Resistance to antibiotics becomes difficult when treating S. aureus and requires continual development of new drugs to combat the rising concern for infections in clinical and household environments. Combinatorial therapies have been shown to be effective at reducing the adaptive responses that lead to antibiotic resistance (Penicillin, 2019). However, implementation of these approaches in household settings has not been thoroughly investigated and is important as more individuals are turning towards alternative methods like essential oils. Essential oils have been of great interest for exhibiting broad biological properties. They are aromatic liquids derived from plants that have demonstrated therapeutic, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties (Dhifi et al, 2016). Due to these properties, essential oils are becoming a desirable alternative ingredient in cosmetics, food, beverages, and medicinal applications (Dhifi et al, 2016). Importantly, studies have recognized that essential oils have properties that can eliminate bacterial growth and enhance the bactericidal effects of beta-lactams. Many studies focus on selected essential oils to provide an explanation to their mechanisms. Furthermore, studies have shown the synergistic effect of antibiotics and essential oils against various human pathogens. Recently, it was shown that, geranium oil enhanced the action of piperacillin at a lower dose compared to piperacillin alone (Orchard, 2017). Piperacillin and penicillin are members of the same drug class, suggesting that combinatorial treatments may be feasible against S. aureus. However, few studies have investigated the combination of antibiotics with essential oils. Therefore, it is important to investigate if the standard treatment of penicillin will portray these mechanisms with the essential oils. With the combination of penicillin and similar drugs with essential oils, there is the potential to enhance bactericidal effects thus decreasing resistance. The essential oils, lavender and tea tree, were selected for the experimentation. Lavender oil is utilized in perfumes, household cleaners, and bath products due its antimicrobial properties (Kavanaugh et al, 2012). Lavender oil is one of the most common essential oils used in household environments. Studies have identified that they can help enhance bacterial elimination. However, they cannot completely eradicate the bacteria (Kavanaugh et al, 2012). Similarly, tea tree oil contains antibacterial and immune stimulant properties and has shown to rapidly decrease bacterial strains, such as Klebsiella spp. and S. maltophilia (May et al, 2000). Lavender and tea tree oil exhibit antibacterial properties and can decrease bacteria. However, they cannot completely eradicate those bacterial strains. Recent studies have discovered that thyme oil and lemon oil are active against S. aureus and other bacterial strains (Man et al, 2019). The essential oils selected for this study have similar structures and mechanisms to the oils used in previous studies, indicating that lavender and tea tree oil should be potent in eliminating bacteria. The study has been conducted to investigate how the addition of essential oils to penicillin will affect the viability of S. aureus due to a lack of research of this combination. It was hypothesized that the addition of lavender and tea tree oils to the penicillin treatment would decrease viability in S. aureus. The study aimed to determine the individual potencies of the essential oils and penicillin. It was hypothesized that the individual treatments would decrease the viability but not completely eradicate the bacteria. The study focused on determining the combinatorial effects of penicillin and the essential oils. It was hypothesized that the combination would have a higher potency than the individual treatments following the data seen in previous studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Essential Oil and Penicillin Material The oils, Tea tree pure essential oil therapeutic grade and lavender pure essential oil were acquired from Amazon. Penicillin G (potassium salt) 5g was utilized in the experiment. Bacterial Strain The bacterial strain, Staphylococcus aureus Subsp. aureus Rosenbach (ATCC 25904), was used to test the essential oil and penicillin treatments. The bacterial strain was inoculated in trypticase- soy media. Turbidity Assay There is no clear standardization of the methodology to evaluate the activity of essential as wellestablished as antibiotics. Therefore, in the beginning of the experiment, the turbidity assay was used to investigate the individual effects of essential oils and penicillin on the viability of S. aureus and to identify the standard growth curve for the bacterial strain.. In order to complete the assay, bacterial pellets were isolated by centrifugation at 3000g for 15 minutes. The assay required a 0.9% NaCl solution that was used to resuspend each bacterial pellet. The assay was performed using a turbidity assay sensor, in which each absorbance was recorded. After generating and interpreting data, the methodology was switched to disk diffusion assay due to issues with the solubility of the essential oils. Mueller Hinton Agar Plates The plates were made by adding 38g of Mueller Hinton Agar media to 1L of water. Next the agar was placed on a hot plate with frequent agitation and boiled for one minute to completely dissolve the medium. Once that was complete, the medium was placed in an autoclave at 121C for 15 minutes. Finally, the media was poured into plates till the bottom was completely covered. Plates were solidified at room temperature and stored in a refrigerator for future use. Disk Diffusion Assay Investigating the Individual Effects of Essential Oils and Penicillin The disk diffusion assay was utilized to determine the individual effects of essential oils and penicillin on the viability of S. aureus. Disk diffusion assay is one of the most methods used for susceptibility testing. In the experiment, each disk contained a different treatment and were placed on Mueller Hinton Agar Plates. For individual treatments, each trial contained 41 disks: a ten- fold dilution of lavender oil, tea tree oil, DMSO (negative control), and penicillin were completed to acquire data from broad concentrations. For the essential oil and DMSO treatments, the first disk contained solely the lavender oil, tea tree oil or penicillin. The second concentration was 1 mL of the selected oil in 9 mL of broth. This was then diluted as seen in Figure 1. For penicillin, the initial concentration had 0.1g/ml penicillin in 9 mL of broth. Figure 2 shows the concentration was diluted to complete the ten-fold dilution. With the serial dilution, it allowed for the comparison of the effect of the essential oils and penicillin against the viability of S. aureus. The ten-fold dilution allowed for ten different concentrations to be tested to observe the differing effects they individually had on the viability and if there was a relationship with the dosages. The DMSO was used to identify if the oils could have a masking effect, such as promoting the growth of S. aureus. In addition, there was a positive control of chloroform to eliminate all the bacteria and a negative control without treatment to be able to analyze the viability of S. aureus. Before the placement of the disks, a lawn of bacteria was grown by adding 20L of S. aureus to each plate. The lawn was created by distributing the bacterial inoculation across the plate using a cell spreader. 20L of treatment were added to each disk of each concentration and applied onto the agar plate. For penicillin, one disk was placed per plate. The essential oils and DMSO disks were placed three disks to a plate, containing the same concentration. Plates were then placed in the incubator for 24 hours. The zone of inhibition was measured using the program, Image J, to compare the efficiency of each individual treatment and to identify the IC50 for penicillin. Figure 1. Serial Dilution for Essential Oil Treatments Figure 2. Serial Dilution for Penicillin Treatments Investigating the Combinatorial Effects of Essential Oils and Penicillin The disk diffusion assay was also used to determine the combinatorial effects of essential oils and penicillin. For each trial, 23 plates were made and used. The treatment groups used were the combination of penicillin and lavender oil and the combination of penicillin and tea tree oil to try and answer the main question. In addition, there were treatment groups of the lavender oil, tea tree oil, and the IC50 of penicillin. These treatment groups were tested in order to normalize the data and ensure that the results could be interpreted correctly. These trials also used chloroform as the positive control and had a negative control with no treatment. On each plate, a lawn of bacteria was placed using the exact methodology above. The treatment disks with the individual essential oils and the IC50 of penicillin were made using the methodology above. For these trials, only the positive dilutions were placed on the agar plates. The combination treatment contained the IC50 of penicillin with the differing essential oil concentrations in a 1:1 ratio and added to broth as seen in Table 1. 20L of treatment were added to each disk of each concentration and applied onto the agar plate. Each trial was placed in the incubator for 24 hours and had the zone of inhibitions measured using image J. Combination Penicillin + EO IC50 + 1E+2 IC50 + 1E-2 IC50 + 1E-4 IC50 + 1E-6 IC50 + 1E-8 Table 1. Combinatorial Treatments RESULTS DETERMINING THE INDIVIDUAL EFFECTS OF ESSENTIAL OILS & PENICILLIN Essential oils are potent in decreasing the viability of S. aureus. Different concentrations of tea tree oil and lavender oil were tested against a strain of Staphylococcus aureus using a disk diffusion assay to determine their efficacy. It was hypothesized that the individual essential oil treatments would decrease the viability. The zone of inhibition sizes measured varied depending on the oils and concentrations used as seen in Figure 3. Figure 3 demonstrates results acquired from the disk diffusion assay and portrays how the zones vary by the treatment group. Figure 4 demonstrates the effect of the essential oils selected on the growth of S. aureus using an inhibition percentage relative to the positive control, chloroform. The essential oils showed potency against the tested bacterial strain and portrayed a dosage dependent relationship. The zone of inhibition decreased as the treatment concentration became more dilute. Figure 4 depicts how the essential oils have a higher potency when they are less dilute; however, they are not potent enough to eliminate the bacterial strain entirely. The highest potency of lavender oil and tea tree oil was observed at their beginning dilution (1 E+2). The graph depicts the tea tree oil eliminated 47% of the bacterial strain while lavender oil eliminated 45% at this concentration. Compared to the positive control, the essential oils are not as potent. However, they are capable of decreasing the viability of S. aureus. Compared to the negative control, the essential oils can eliminate more than ten percent of the bacterial strain. Throughout the diluted concentrations, lavender and tea tree oil portray a similar potency until the fourth dilution. From the fourth to seventh dilution, there was a larger inhibition depicted in tea tree oil. Figure 3. Representative Images of Disk Diffusion Assays Figure 4. Potency of Essential oils in Decreasing S. aureus Viability Penicillin is potent in decreasing S. aureus viability. In addition, different concentrations of penicillin were tested in a disk diffusion assay to determine its efficacy and to investigate the IC50 to use in the combinatorial treatment. It was hypothesized that penicillin would be potent and decrease the viability of the bacterial strain. Figure 5 depicts that penicillin also had a dosage dependent relationship. Compared to the positive control, the concentrations tested eliminated less, but they had a higher potency than the lavender and tea tree oil. Compared to the negative control, the concentrations tested were much more potent by differing in a forty to eighty five percent difference between them. Figure 5 shows how the first nine concentrations could eliminate more than 50% of the bacterial strain when normalized to the controls. The first concentration (0.1g/ml) had the highest potency and eliminated 85% of the bacterial strain. The IC50 is defined as the concentration of penicillin at which half of the bacterial culture is eliminated. Figure 5 shows that the ideal concentration in the target effective range to acquire the IC50 is the ninth penicillin concentration (1 E-9 g). This concentration was used to investigate the combinatorial effects of the essential oils and penicillin. Figure 5. Potency of Penicillin in Decreasing S. aureus Viability DETERMINING THE COMBINATORIAL EFFECTS OF ESSENTIAL OILS & PENICILLIN Lavender and tea tree oil exhibit antagonistic activity in combination with penicillin. The study also focused upon analyzing the combinatorial effects from applying treatment disks with different essential oil and penicillin treatments. It was hypothesized that the addition of the essential oils to penicillin would decrease the viability of S. aureus. Each of the positive concentrations were used in combination with the IC50 of penicillin at a ratio of 1:1. Analysis of the results in Figure 6 showed significant differences from what was expected. It was estimated that the combination of the essential oils and penicillin would depict an additive effect. An additive effect describes how a combined effect will be produced by the action of two or more agents. It was expected that the combination of penicillin and essential oils would eliminate more bacteria than the individual treatments. Figure 6 shows how the combinatorial treatments were not very active and were less potent than penicillin alone for majority of the combinations. The combination that used the first dilution of the essential oil (1 E+2) had the highest potency and had a slightly higher efficacy than the target range of the penicillin. The lavender oil and penicillin combination had a 28% inhibition while the tea tree oil combination had a 42% inhibition. Similar to the individual effects of the essential oils, the treatments with tea tree oil had a higher potency than the treatments with lavender oil. The other combinations had a lower zone of inhibition than target range, but they were higher than the zones for the individual essential oil treatments. Figure 6 does not portray an additive effect; the combinatorial treatments rather show an antagonist relationship. An antagonist effect depicts how the effect of the two treatments is less than the sum of the individual treatments. The combinations overall portray an inhibition that is less than sum of the target effective range, penicillin, and the essential oils. Zone of Inhibition (Relative to Ctrl) Figure 6. Potency of Combinations in Decreasing S. aureus Viability DISCUSSION The number of scientific studies on the activity of antibiotics and essential oils has grown over the years; however, the use of many susceptibility testing and different definitions of efficacy make it difficult to fully comprehend the potency of their combinations. Many studies focus on selected essential oils to provide an explanation to their mechanisms, but few studies have investigated the combination of antibiotics with essential oils. This research was conducted to investigate the efficacy of the essential oils and penicillin on one of the most common pathogenic species, S. aureus, as seen in Figure 7. S. aureus causes diseases, such as MRSA and bacteremia. The study revealed that tea tree oil, lavender oil, and penicillin have potency to eliminate S. aureus to. However, individually, there are not able to completely eradicate the bacteria. The results showed that the tested treatments reduced the growth of the bacterial strain in similar pattern. The individual and combinatorial treatment depicted that there was a dosage dependent relationship, in which the zone of inhibition decreased as the concentration became more dilute. Out of the two essential oils, tea tree oil exhibited a higher potency at all the tested concentrations. At the lowest concentration, it had an 18% inhibition, while at the higher concentration, S. aureus growth was reduced, with a 47% inhibition. These findings over the individual effects are consistent with results seen in previous studies that have investigated other essential oils. Previous studies have discovered that thyme oil and lemon oil are active against S. aureus and other bacterial strains. The essential oils selected for this study have similar structures and mechanisms to the oils used in previous studies, indicating that lavender and tea tree oil should be potent in eliminating bacteria. Occasionally, essential oils have been found to synergistic or additive when used in combination with an antibiotic. Studies have depicted the potential for essential oils to act synergistically with antibiotics due to essential oils inhibiting efflux pumps that can restore the activity of the antibiotics. Studies have showed that the combination of ampicillin and eucalyptus oil against S. aureus portrayed a synergistic effect. The synergistic effect exceeds the sum of their individual presentation while the additive sums the individual effects. However, the findings acquired were not consistent with previous research. Although the essential oils and penicillin showed moderate antibacterial effects alone, the interactions between the antibiotic and essential oils were not synergistic or additive against S. aureus. It has been examined that the combination of essential oils and penicillin possess bactericidal activity that is slightly higher than the potency of the oils alone. However, results indicate that lavender and tea tree oil exhibit antagonistic activity when in combination with penicillin, which is opposite of what was expected and observed in previous studies. The zone of inhibition is less than the sum of the two individual effects. Observations of the disk diffusion assay plates included a foul aroma being released that indicated there could have been an issue with the glycerol stocks used in the third trial. In order to investigate the issue, it would have been imperative to complete further trials with new glycerol stocks. This was not possible due to a restraint in lab availability and time. However, the foul aroma only arose in half of the disk diffusion assay plates in the trial. There was no correlation in the plates that had the aroma. While analyzing the first two trials and taking these observations, it can be estimated that the glycerol stocks were not the issue since it did not affect all the plates used. In addition, the treatments were synthesized in the same order and every time before the disk diffusion assay was completed. It is possible that this was the source of error that induced the foul aroma and the difference in the relationship observed with the combinations. However, all the trials completed were consistent with the results of an antagonistic relationship with the addition of essential oils to penicillin. Further research would have investigated the source of the issue to ensure that the combination of the penicillin and essential oils truly demonstrate an antagonistic effect. In order to answer this question, disk diffusion assays would be completed with new glycerol stocks and new agar plates. If the same observations persisted, there would be a revision over the completion of the treatments and their application. If after these revisions were completed and the combination portrayed an antagonistic relationship, it would be beneficial to test these combinations against multiple bacterial strains to investigate if the combination itself is antagonist or if it only occurs against S. aureus. The data collected may contribute to the ongoing scientific investigation regarding the application of essential oils as a prospective source of alternative antimicrobial agents. The emergence of antibiotic resistance indicates that new alternatives must be created to help prevent the prevalence of these emerging bacterial strains. Additionally, the optimal ratio should be explored for higher efficacy. Figure 7. Graphical Summarization of Research Works Cited Charles, D. J., & Simon, J. E. (1990). Comparison of extraction methods for the rapid determination of essential oil content and composition of basil. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 115(3), 458-462. D I , ., B , S., J , S., (2016). E S B A O .M C C , 3(4), 25. Kavanaugh, Nicole L., and Katharina Ribbeck. "Selected antimicrobial essential oils eradicate Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms." Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78.11 (2012): 4057-4061. K , J., U , A.C., L , F.D. (2015). S :T within households and the community. Trends in Microbiology. 23(7). 437-444 Man, A., Santacroce, L., Jacob, R., Mare, A., & Man, L. (2019). Antimicrobial Activity of Six Essential Oils Against a Group of Human Pathogens. Pathogens, 8(1), 15. May, J., Chan, C. H., King, A., Williams, L., & French, G. L. (2000). Time kill studies of tea . Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 45(5), 639-643. Orchard, A., and Vuuren, S. (2017) Commercial Essential Oils as Potential Antimicrobials. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Penicillin (Oral Route, Injection Route, Intravenous Route, Intramuscular Route) Description and Brand Names. (2019, September 1). Retrieved from https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugssupplements/penicillin-oral-route-injection-route-intravenous-route-intramuscularroute/description/drg-20062334 Tong, S., Davis, J.S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T.L., & Fowler, V.G. (2015). Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestation, and Management. American Society for Microbiology, 28(3), 603-661. Van H , S.J., J , S.O., V (2012). P M M , 10(11), 50. , V.L., E S a h lococc , B.A., P , D.L., G , I.B. a e Bacteremia. American Society for  ...

... The item referenced in this repository content can be found by following the link on the descriptive page.  ...

... The item referenced in this repository content can be found by following the link on the descriptive page.  ...

... Developing a Fluorescence Assay to Test the Effects of Saccharin on Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria Alexis Felty, Taylor Kowalski, Parker Williams College of Arts and Sciences, Marian University Indianapolis 3200 Cold Spring Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46222 BACKGROUND RESULTS o More than 98% of the human gut microbiome consists of bacteria that either belong to the Firmicutes or Bacteroidetes phyla [1]. Figure 3. Fluorescence increased in accuracy after double centrifugation. o The accuracy of fluorescence increased after double centrifugation, not necessarily the intensity. o This could be attributed to staining the entire bacterial suspension, not just the bacteria. o HI quenching was best visualized when suspensions were double centrifuged. Figure 1. An individuals BMI is proportional to their F/B ratio [2]. Figure 5. Microfuge tubes before (left) and after (right) double centrifugation with stains. o A gram staining protocol using SYTO 13 and HI will be implemented to quantify the viability of the bacteria. o Fluorescent labeling provides more robust identification of bacteria than CFUs. o Hypothesis: Bacterial suspensions with a larger concentration of S. aureus will more intensely fluoresce red than those with a larger concentration of E. coli. o Will carry forward centrifugation before microplate assay. This provided more accurate fluorescence readings. MATERIALS AND METHODS Grow S. aureus & E. coli CONCLUSIONS Figure 2. Expected colors of fluorescence of SYTO 13 and HI. FUTURE DIRECTIONS o Further address the lack of linearity in red channel o Apply fluorescent labeling protocol to L. casei and B. vulgatus o Independently inoculate L. casei and B. vulgatus with saccharin o Inoculate L. casei and B. vulgatus with saccharin in a co-culture Create Bacterial Solutions Centrifuge LITERATURE CITED Add Stains [1] Thomas, Franois, et al. "Environmental and gut bacteroidetes: the food connection." Frontiers in microbiology 2 (2011): 93. [2] Koliada, Alexander, et al. "Association between body mass index and Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in an adult Ukrainian population." BMC microbiology 17.1 (2017): 120. [3] Mason, David J., et al. "A fluorescent Gram stain for flow cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy." Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64.7 (1998): 2681-2685. o SYTO 13 & HI diffuse into the cell and bind to DNA o HI quenches SYTO 13 [3] Incubate Centrifuge Microplate Assay o Gram-negative: E. coli o Gram-positive: S. aureus ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Figure 4. Tube 12 viewed under a fluorescent microscope. We would like to thank Dr. Colleen Doi and fellow BIO 311 students for all of their peer review and help throughout this process.  ...